Nexus vs Google Vertex AI: Cloud Agent Builder vs Enterprise AI
Google Vertex AI Agent Builder gives developers tools to build agents on GCP. Nexus deploys production agents in weeks with FDEs. Full comparison inside.
Last updated: February 2026
Quick honest summary
Google Vertex AI Agent Builder is a developer-centric platform within Google Cloud for building, deploying, and managing AI agents. It includes the Agent Development Kit (ADK), Agent Engine for managed runtime, Conversational Agents (formerly Dialogflow CX), 100+ pre-built connectors, and deep integration with Gemini models and the broader GCP ecosystem. Google also offers Gemini Enterprise (formerly Agentspace) at $30/user/month as the enterprise-facing layer for deploying agents to business users. It is a serious, well-resourced product from one of the largest cloud providers in the world.
Nexus is something structurally different: an enterprise AI agent platform paired with a dedicated service layer. Forward Deployed Engineers (FDEs) embed with your team, help identify the highest-impact use cases, design agents for your specific reality, handle integration complexity, and drive adoption. It is not just software. It is a solution: platform plus service.
This comparison comes down to a core question: who is building, who is maintaining, and who owns the outcome?
Vertex AI Agent Builder is powerful if you have the engineering team to build, deploy, and maintain agents on GCP. But most business processes, the ones that move revenue and free capacity, are owned by business teams, not developers. They live across Salesforce, SAP, WhatsApp, Slack, email, and dozens of other systems. Getting those agents into production requires more than a toolkit. It requires organizational change, integration across legacy systems, and a partner who stays with you after deployment.
That is the gap Nexus fills. For a deeper look at this decision, see the build-vs-buy enterprise analysis.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | Google Vertex AI Agent Builder | Nexus |
|---|---|---|
| What it is |
|
|
| What it does |
|
|
| Who builds and owns it |
|
|
| Handles exceptions? |
|
|
| Deployment speed |
|
|
| Pricing model |
|
|
| Integrations |
|
|
| Security and compliance |
|
|
| Service model |
|
|
| Deployment model |
|
|
| AI models |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
When Google Vertex AI Agent Builder is the better choice
Google has invested heavily in its agent platform, and there are real scenarios where it is the right choice. Being honest about that matters.
-
You have a dedicated AI engineering team and your infrastructure runs on GCP. If your organization is already deeply invested in Google Cloud (Compute Engine, BigQuery, Cloud Storage, Workspace), Vertex AI Agent Builder is the natural extension. Agents inherit your existing GCP security policies, IAM roles, and infrastructure. The ADK lets developers build production-ready agents in Python or Java with fine-grained control over orchestration, state management, and tool use.
-
You are building AI agents as part of your product, not for internal operations. If agents are customer-facing and core to what you sell (a chatbot product, a search product, a customer service product), it often makes sense for engineering to own the full stack. Vertex AI gives developers the architectural control they need for these deeply custom, product-facing use cases.
-
You need deep integration with Google Workspace and Gemini. For organizations running on Google Workspace (Gmail, Drive, Calendar, Docs), Gemini Enterprise provides native access to AI agents within those tools. If the goal is AI-assisted productivity inside Google apps specifically, Gemini Enterprise handles that well at $30/user/month.
-
You want to use the open-source ADK with flexibility to self-host. The Agent Development Kit is open-source and framework-agnostic. Developers can build agents locally, test them, and deploy to any container runtime, not just GCP. For teams that want to experiment with agent architectures without platform lock-in at the framework level, ADK provides that flexibility.
-
Multi-agent orchestration and A2A protocol matter to your architecture. Google's A2A (Agent-to-Agent) protocol is a genuine contribution to the ecosystem. If your engineering team is building multi-agent systems that need to communicate across different frameworks and vendors (such as LangGraph or CrewAI), Vertex AI's support for A2A is worth evaluating.
-
You need HIPAA compliance or strict data residency within GCP. Vertex AI inherits Google Cloud's compliance certifications, including HIPAA. For organizations with healthcare-adjacent workloads or strict data residency requirements that GCP already meets, this is a meaningful advantage.
When Nexus is the better choice
Enterprises that partner with Nexus tend to share a specific pattern: they evaluated cloud platform tools (or tried building internally), realized the engineering investment and organizational change required was too high, and chose a platform-plus-service approach instead.
-
The business process you want to automate is owned by business teams, not developers. Customer onboarding, sales research, support triage, compliance monitoring, HR operations. These workflows are owned by operations, sales, marketing, and support leaders. Asking engineering to build and maintain agents for these processes means competing with core product work. Nexus puts business teams in control. At Orange, the business team built and deployed customer onboarding agents in 4 weeks, without engineering dependency. At Lambda ($4B+ AI company), a non-engineer on the sales intelligence team built their agent himself.
-
You need agents that work across your entire tech stack, not just GCP. Most enterprises run Salesforce, SAP, HubSpot, ServiceNow, Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, and dozens of other systems alongside whatever cloud provider they use. Vertex AI Agent Builder offers 100+ connectors, strongest within the Google ecosystem. Nexus connects to 4,000+ enterprise systems natively. One agent, multiple systems, no code changes.
-
You want a partner who stays after deployment, not just a platform to figure out on your own. Vertex AI Agent Builder is self-serve. You get documentation, Google Cloud support tiers, and potentially a Google Cloud partner for implementation. Nexus embeds Forward Deployed Engineers alongside your team from day one: real engineers who identify the right use cases, design agents for your specific reality, handle integration complexity, manage organizational change, and optimize agents continuously. This is why Nexus has a 100% POC-to-contract conversion rate.
-
Your engineering team is already stretched. Most enterprise engineering teams are juggling core product work, infrastructure, and a growing backlog. Building and maintaining AI agents on Vertex AI adds to that queue. Lambda, a $4B+ AI infrastructure company with world-class engineers, ran this exact calculation and concluded: the opportunity cost is too high. Every hour their engineers spent on internal tools was an hour not spent on their core product. They deployed with Nexus in weeks what would have taken months internally.
-
You need measurable financial outcomes, not a successful technical deployment. Vertex AI can help you deploy an agent. Whether that agent delivers business value depends on use case selection, process design, integration quality, change management, and adoption. Nexus is structured around outcomes: every engagement starts with a 3-month POC tied to specific, measurable business results. You see the math before committing.
-
You tried building on cloud platforms and it did not deliver production use cases. A multi-billion euro telecom operator (13,000+ employees, 500M+ revenue) evaluated platform-based approaches for internal automation. After months, they had not delivered production use cases at the scale they needed. With Nexus, they built and deployed a dozen agents (support, compliance, registration, escalation handling), freed 40% of support capacity, and maintained 100% regulatory compliance across millions of interactions. The difference was not features. It was what each approach is built to deliver.
What enterprises experienced
Orange Group: 100% adoption, $4M+ yearly revenue
Orange, a multi-billion euro telecom with 120,000+ employees across Europe and Africa, had every option available: internal engineering, cloud platform tools, enterprise AI assistants, external agencies. They chose Nexus.
Their business team (not engineering) built autonomous customer onboarding agents using the Nexus platform, with support from a Forward Deployed Engineer. Deployed in 4 weeks across multiple European markets and languages. The agent collects customer information, validates against systems, checks compatibility, routes unusual cases, and escalates complex issues with full context. Result: 50% conversion improvement, $4M+ incremental yearly revenue.
The adoption metric tells the real story: 100% of the team uses the agents daily, because the agents live inside the channels they already work in. There is nothing new to adopt. The AI is invisible; the outcomes are not.
Lambda ($4B+ AI company): chose to buy, not build
Lambda, a $4B+ AI company with 500M+ ARR, evaluated building agents on cloud platforms including Vertex AI before choosing Nexus's platform approach. They employ world-class AI engineers. If any company had the engineering depth and cloud infrastructure to invest months of build time into custom agent systems, it was Lambda.
Their CTO concluded the build time and permanent engineering commitment could not be justified against their core product. Every hour their engineers spent on internal tools was an hour not spent on their core product. They deployed with Nexus in weeks what would have taken months.
Result: $4B+ pipeline discovered across 12,000+ accounts monitored autonomously, 24,000+ hours of research capacity added annually (equivalent to 12 full-time analysts), and $7M+ projected annual value. The agent was built by their Head of Sales Intelligence, who has no engineering background.
If a $4B+ AI company chose to buy from Nexus instead of building (on any platform), the question for most enterprises becomes: what is the opportunity cost of trying to build this yourself?
Major European telecom: months without production use cases, then deployed a dozen with Nexus
A multi-billion euro telecom operator (13,000+ employees, EUR500M+ revenue) evaluated platform-based tooling for internal automation. After months of effort, they had not delivered production use cases at the scale they needed. In the same timeframe with Nexus, they built and deployed a dozen agents: support agents, compliance agents, registration agents, escalation handlers.
Result: 40% of support capacity freed. Full regulatory compliance maintained across millions of interactions. 12-week deployment timeline. The difference was not the underlying technology. It was the approach: a solution (platform plus embedded engineering support) versus a toolkit that requires your team to figure everything out.
Key differences explained
Cloud platform toolkit vs. independent enterprise solution
This is the architectural distinction that shapes everything else.
Google Vertex AI Agent Builder is a set of tools within Google Cloud Platform. It gives developers powerful capabilities: the ADK for building multi-agent systems, Agent Engine for managed runtime, Conversational Agents for dialog flows, and 100+ connectors to enterprise systems. But it is, fundamentally, a toolkit. Your team builds. Your team deploys. Your team maintains. Your team figures out which use cases to prioritize, how to drive adoption, and how to measure value.
Nexus is a complete enterprise solution: platform plus embedded service. It is independent of any cloud provider. Your agents connect to any system (4,000+ integrations), deploy to any channel, and use any AI model. Forward Deployed Engineers work alongside your team to identify the right use cases, design agents for your specific workflows, handle integration, drive adoption, and optimize continuously.
The difference shows up in timelines. Enterprises building on cloud toolkits typically measure agent deployment in months or quarters. Nexus POCs go live in 2-6 weeks. Orange deployed in 4 weeks. Lambda deployed in days. The Proximus-scale telecom deployed a dozen agents in 12 weeks.
Software vs. solution: the FDE model
Most enterprise AI vendors (including Google) sell software and let you figure it out. Some offer professional services through partners. But the implementation gap is where most enterprise AI projects die.
Nexus addresses this structurally with Forward Deployed Engineers. FDEs are not support staff or implementation consultants who hand you a report and leave. They are real engineers who embed with your organization during the POC and beyond. They help identify the highest-impact use cases first (not guessing based on templates), design agents that fit your specific reality (not generic off-the-shelf), handle integration complexity (so your team does not have to learn a new platform), and run pilots without requiring internal engineering resources.
Deploying AI at scale is 10% technology and 90% organizational change. Google gives you the 10%. Nexus covers the full 100%.
This is why Nexus has a 100% POC-to-contract conversion rate. Every pilot delivers measurable value because it is not left to chance.
Ecosystem lock-in vs. system-agnostic
Google Vertex AI Agent Builder works within the GCP ecosystem. It is strongest when your data lives in BigQuery, your apps run on Compute Engine, and your team collaborates in Google Workspace. The 100+ connectors extend reach to third-party systems, and the open-source ADK provides framework flexibility. But the production runtime (Agent Engine), the enterprise layer (Gemini Enterprise), and the deepest integrations all pull toward GCP.
For enterprises whose entire infrastructure runs on Google Cloud, this is fine. For the majority of enterprises running a mix of AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premise systems, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, and dozens of other tools, it introduces friction. This is the same ecosystem lock-in concern that applies to Microsoft Agent Framework. Every additional layer of integration adds complexity, cost, and engineering dependency.
Nexus is system-agnostic by design. 4,000+ native integrations across CRMs, ERPs, communication tools, databases, and custom APIs. Agents deploy to Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, email, phone, web widgets, and internal portals. No cloud provider dependency. No ecosystem lock-in. Your agents work across your actual tech stack, whatever that looks like.
Developer-first vs. business-team-first
This is the distinction that matters most for internal business operations.
Vertex AI Agent Builder is developer-first. The ADK supports Python and Java. Taking full advantage of advanced features requires familiarity with Google Cloud services and AI model configurations. The Gemini Enterprise layer offers a no-code Agent Designer for simpler use cases, but production-grade agents for complex enterprise workflows typically need engineering involvement. This is by design: Google is building tools for developers.
Nexus is business-team-first. Business users define agents step-by-step with FDE support: agent objectives, behaviors, decision logic, data connections, deployment channels. At Lambda, the Head of Sales Intelligence (no engineering background) built the agent that now monitors 12,000+ accounts. At Orange, the business team deployed agents across multiple markets in 4 weeks. At a European consulting firm (400+ employees), operations teams built and now own five different agents across their consulting lifecycle.
When business teams own the agents, iteration is fast, adoption is high, and there is no engineering bottleneck.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use both Vertex AI Agent Builder and Nexus?
Yes. They serve different purposes in many organizations. Vertex AI Agent Builder is well-suited for engineering teams building product-facing AI capabilities on GCP. Nexus handles autonomous workflow execution for business operations across your entire tech stack. Engineering builds product features on GCP; business teams deploy operational agents on Nexus. They do not conflict.
What about Google Gemini Enterprise (formerly Agentspace)?
Gemini Enterprise is Google's enterprise-facing AI product at $30/user/month (or $21/user/month for Gemini Business). It provides AI-assisted productivity within Google Workspace and the ability to publish custom agents built in Vertex AI. Think of it as Google's answer to Microsoft Copilot: an AI assistant layer for individual productivity within Google apps. Nexus is a different category. Nexus agents complete entire business processes autonomously, across any system, with full governance. If your goal is AI-assisted productivity inside Google Workspace specifically, Gemini Enterprise does that. If the goal is business process transformation with measurable outcomes, that is what Nexus is built for.
We are already on GCP. Why not just use Vertex AI?
Being on GCP gives you infrastructure. It does not give you the use case identification, process design, integration across non-GCP systems, change management, and adoption support that determine whether AI actually delivers business outcomes. Lambda is an infrastructure company running on cloud platforms. They could have built on any toolkit. They chose Nexus because the opportunity cost of engineering time was too high and the speed of Nexus deployment was too compelling. The question is not whether your infrastructure can support agent development. It is whether your organization has the engineering bandwidth, the cross-system integration capability, and the organizational change management capacity to turn a toolkit into production outcomes. Nexus provides all three.
What are Forward Deployed Engineers?
Forward Deployed Engineers (FDEs) are real engineers who embed with your organization during the POC and beyond. They are not support staff and not consultants. They work alongside your team to identify the highest-impact use cases, design agents for your specific workflows and systems, handle integration complexity (connecting to your CRMs, ERPs, legacy systems, communication tools), run pilots without requiring your internal engineering resources, manage organizational change, and optimize agents continuously based on real-world performance. This is the service layer that separates Nexus from every platform-only approach. Deploying AI at scale is 10% technology and 90% organizational change. FDEs cover the full picture.
How does pricing compare?
Google Vertex AI Agent Builder uses consumption-based pricing: Agent Engine runtime fees ($0.0994/vCPU-hour, with a free tier of 50 vCPU-hours/month), Gemini model usage costs, code execution fees, session storage fees, and connector costs. Gemini Enterprise adds $30/user/month for business user access. Costs scale with usage and headcount, and enterprises have reported that GCP costs can escalate quickly without careful management.
Nexus charges per-agent, tied to the value delivered. An agent handling customer onboarding for millions of customers costs the same whether your company has 500 or 50,000 employees. Every engagement starts with a 3-month POC tied to measurable outcomes. For reference: Orange generates $4M+ yearly revenue from their agents, and Lambda projects $7M+ annual value. You see the ROI math before making a long-term commitment.
Do I need engineering resources to use Nexus?
No. That is one of the core differences. Vertex AI Agent Builder requires engineering teams to build, deploy, and maintain agents. Nexus is designed so business teams own the agents, supported by Forward Deployed Engineers who handle the technical complexity. At Lambda, the agent was built by the Head of Sales Intelligence (no engineering background). At Orange, the business team deployed in 4 weeks without engineering dependency. Nexus is not positioned as a "no-code tool." It is a solution where the combination of platform and embedded engineering support means your business teams can move at the speed of business, not the speed of your engineering backlog.
Worth exploring?
If your team has been evaluating Google Vertex AI Agent Builder (or has tried building agents on GCP) and the gap between having a toolkit and having production agents delivering business outcomes feels familiar, you are not alone. The toolkit is powerful. The question is whether your organization has the engineering bandwidth and organizational change capacity to turn that toolkit into results.
It might be worth seeing how Orange achieved 100% adoption and $4M+ yearly revenue with agents that complete work autonomously. Or how Lambda ($4B+ AI company with world-class engineers) chose to buy from Nexus instead of building on any platform, and discovered $4B+ in pipeline they were missing. Or how a multi-billion euro telecom deployed a dozen production use cases with Nexus after months of effort with platform-based tooling had not delivered.
Every engagement starts with a 3-month proof of concept tied to specific outcomes. A Forward Deployed Engineer works alongside your team from day one. You see the math before committing.
Related comparisons
- Nexus vs Microsoft Agent Framework - Microsoft's developer framework vs. Nexus's enterprise agent platform
- Nexus vs LangGraph - Developer framework comparison: LangGraph vs. Nexus platform + service
- AI Agents vs Developer Frameworks - The full category comparison: when to build vs. when to buy
- Build vs Buy AI Agents - The complete enterprise guide to the build vs. buy decision
- Nexus vs Microsoft Copilot - AI assistants vs. AI agents: different categories entirely
- Back to all comparisons
Related comparisons
Your next
step is clear
Every engagement starts with a 3-month proof of concept tied to specific, measurable business outcomes. Forward Deployed Engineers embed with your team from day one.