Nexus vs Microsoft Agent Framework: Azure AI vs Enterprise Agents

Quick honest summary

Microsoft Agent Framework is Microsoft's open-source SDK for building multi-agent AI systems. It merges AutoGen's multi-agent orchestration (54,000+ GitHub stars before the rebrand) with Semantic Kernel's enterprise connectors into a unified, production-grade framework, now backed by Microsoft Foundry for managed deployment. It is a serious, well-supported developer toolkit for engineering teams that want to build custom agent architectures within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Nexus is an enterprise AI agent platform paired with a white-glove service layer. Business teams build and deploy autonomous agents without writing code, across any system (not just Microsoft), with Forward Deployed Engineers embedded alongside your team from day one. Nexus is a solution, not just software. The platform handles agent creation, deployment, and governance. The service handles everything else: identifying high-impact use cases, designing agents for your reality, managing change, and optimizing continuously.

The core question: do you want your engineering team to assemble agent infrastructure from a developer toolkit within the Microsoft ecosystem? Or do you want a platform and service that delivers production agents in weeks, across any system, with engineers embedded to ensure it works? For the complete build-vs-buy decision framework, see our enterprise analysis.

---

Side-by-side comparison

Dimension	Microsoft Agent Framework	Nexus
What it is	Open-source developer SDK for multi-agent systems Uses AutoGen orchestration + Semantic Kernel connectors Deployed via Microsoft Foundry	Enterprise platform + embedded service Business teams build autonomous AI agents Forward Deployed Engineers ensure production success
Who builds agents	Engineering teams write Python or C# code Define agents, orchestration patterns, and integrations Requires developer expertise	Business teams build and own agents directly Workflow owners are the agent builders No engineering dependency
Support model	Documentation and community forums Microsoft support tiers available Your team owns the full lifecycle	Forward Deployed Engineers embedded with your team Change management included Ongoing optimization 100% POC-to-contract conversion rate
Ecosystem	Microsoft-native by design Built around Azure, M365, Dynamics Microsoft Entra and AI services integration	System-agnostic 4,000+ integrations across CRMs, ERPs, communication tools Works with custom APIs regardless of vendor
Time to production	Weeks to months depending on capacity Architecture decisions and Azure setup required Custom governance work adds time	Days to weeks FDEs handle integration complexity Work alongside your team from day one
Handles exceptions?	Developers code exception handling into agent logic Every edge case must be anticipated manually	Agents adapt intelligently to exceptions Escalate with full context when uncertain No silent failures
Enterprise governance	Inherits Azure security (Entra ID, OpenTelemetry) Agent-level audit trails are custom engineering work Decision traceability and RBAC built by your team	SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR from day one Full audit trails and decision traceability Role-based access at the agent level built in
Ongoing maintenance	Engineering team maintains all agents Manages framework updates and dependency changes Breaking changes possible (GA targeted for Q1 2026)	Platform handles infrastructure Agents adapt to system changes without rebuilds Nexus team continuously optimizes with you
Pricing model	Open-source framework (free) Costs: Azure compute + engineering salaries Custom integration work adds expense	Per-agent pricing tied to value delivered 3-month POC tied to measurable outcomes Commitment only after proven results
Best for	Engineering teams in Microsoft-native organizations Full programmatic control needed Custom multi-agent architectures	Teams needing production agent fleets fast Cross-system deployment required Enterprise governance and embedded support included

---

When Microsoft Agent Framework is the better choice

Microsoft Agent Framework has the weight of one of the most important companies in enterprise technology behind it. There are clear scenarios where it is the right call:

• Your organization is deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem and wants to stay there. If your infrastructure runs on Azure, your team lives in M365, your data sits in Dynamics and SharePoint, and your identity layer is Entra ID, Microsoft Agent Framework gives you native integration with all of it. That home-field advantage is genuine. You are building agents within the environment your engineers already know, with security models they already trust.

• You have a dedicated engineering team that wants full programmatic control. Microsoft Agent Framework gives developers complete control over agent orchestration, task routing, multi-agent coordination, and state management. If you have strong Python or C# engineers who want to design custom agent architectures from the ground up, and your organization is willing to allocate them to this work long-term, this is a well-supported framework with enterprise-grade durability.

• You are building AI agents as part of your product, not for internal operations. If agents are core to what you sell (not tools for your business teams), having engineering own the architecture end-to-end makes sense. Microsoft Agent Framework supports sophisticated patterns like group chat orchestration, debate, and reflection that may matter for product-embedded agent capabilities.

• Open-source visibility matters to your security or compliance team. The framework is open-source with enterprise backing. Organizations that need to inspect the code, audit the orchestration logic, and have confidence in a major vendor's long-term commitment may value that transparency. AutoGen's community momentum (54,000+ stars) reflects genuine developer trust.

• You want to use multiple agent frameworks, not just one. Microsoft Foundry's Agent Service can host agents built with Microsoft Agent Framework, LangGraph, CrewAI, or other open-source frameworks. If your strategy is to run a multi-framework agent environment managed through Azure, Microsoft's approach supports that.

---

When Nexus is the better choice

Companies that partner with Nexus tend to share a specific pattern: they have evaluated developer frameworks, sometimes within Microsoft's ecosystem, sometimes outside it, and realized the gap between a working prototype and production agents serving the business is where the real time and cost lives. That gap is not just technical. It is organizational.

• Business teams need to build and own agents, not wait for engineering. This is the core distinction. With Microsoft Agent Framework, every agent, every change, every new workflow goes through your engineering team. With Nexus, the person who understands the workflow builds and iterates on the agent directly. No tickets, no sprints, no backlog. Lambda's Head of Sales Intelligence, Joaquin Paz, built an agent monitoring 12,000+ enterprise accounts. He is not an engineer. He built it in days.

• You need more than software. You need a partner. Microsoft Agent Framework is a toolkit. You get the building blocks. You own the assembly, the integration, the rollout, the change management, the adoption. Nexus embeds Forward Deployed Engineers with your team from day one. Real engineers who help you identify the highest-impact use cases, design agents that fit your specific reality, handle integration complexity, and run pilots without requiring your internal resources. Deploying AI at scale is 10% technology and 90% organizational change. Nexus is built for both.

• Your systems span more than the Microsoft ecosystem. Most enterprise workflows cross vendor boundaries. A customer onboarding flow might touch Salesforce, a custom API, WhatsApp, and your ERP. A sales intelligence agent might pull from dozens of data sources across multiple platforms. Microsoft Agent Framework works best inside Azure and M365. The moment a workflow crosses the Microsoft boundary, custom integration work begins. Nexus connects to 4,000+ enterprise systems. One agent, multiple vendors, no ecosystem constraints.

• Engineering time has a high opportunity cost. Your engineers could spend months building agent infrastructure within Microsoft Agent Framework, or they could work on your core product. Lambda, a multibillion-dollar AI infrastructure company with world-class engineers, made exactly this calculation and chose to buy. Their reasoning: every month an engineer spends building internal agent tooling is a month not spent on Lambda's core product. The question is not whether your team can build it. It is whether they should.

• You need production agents in weeks, not months. With Microsoft Agent Framework, you are looking at architecture design, development, testing, Azure infrastructure setup, custom governance layers, and change management planning. That timeline is measured in months for production-grade agents. Nexus agents go live in days to weeks, with Forward Deployed Engineers handling the heavy lifting alongside your team. Lambda went from zero to production in days.

• You need enterprise governance without building it yourself. Microsoft Agent Framework inherits Azure's security model (Entra ID, OpenTelemetry, Azure Monitor), and that is a real foundation. But audit trails at the agent decision level, traceability across every interaction, compliance certifications, and role-based access for business teams are your engineering team's responsibility to design and build. Nexus ships with SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, and GDPR compliance built in. For regulated industries and public companies, this is the difference between months of custom governance engineering and day-one readiness.

---

What enterprises experienced

Lambda: a multibillion-dollar AI company chose buy vs. build

This is the proof point that matters most for anyone evaluating a developer framework versus Nexus.

Lambda, a multibillion-dollar AI company with over 600 world-class engineers, evaluated building agents with Microsoft Agent Framework and other Azure-native tooling before choosing Nexus's platform approach. They build supercomputers for AI training and inference. Their customers include Fortune 500 companies, leading AI labs, and research institutions like MIT, Stanford, and Berkeley. If any company had the engineering capacity to invest months of build time into custom multi-agent systems, it was Lambda.

They chose to buy because the build time and permanent engineering commitment could not be justified against their core AI infrastructure product.

Lambda's Head of Sales Intelligence, Joaquin Paz, built an autonomous research agent that monitors 12,000+ enterprise accounts annually, identifies buying signals across dozens of data sources, and synthesizes competitive intelligence. The agent added 24,000+ hours of research capacity annually, equivalent to 12 full-time analysts. Pipeline visibility: $4B+ in cumulative opportunity identified.

The critical detail: Joaquin is not an engineer. He built the agent in days.

Before finding Nexus, Lambda had tried two approaches. Open-ended AI agents (like ChatGPT Deep Search) were intelligent but inconsistent: ask the same question twice, get different results. Traditional automation tools were consistent but rigid: heavy hard-coding, brittle integrations, no reasoning. Nexus delivered both intelligence and consistency, without requiring Lambda's engineering team to build or maintain the infrastructure.

"I'm not an engineer. I built this in days. With the automation tools we looked at before, I would have needed to spec everything out and wait months for development."

-- Joaquin Paz, Head of Sales Intelligence, Lambda

The opportunity cost argument sealed it. Lambda's engineers build AI infrastructure for some of the world's largest companies. Every month an engineer spends building internal agent tooling is a month not spent on Lambda's core product. The math made the decision clear.

Lambda is now expanding from a single agent to an entire agent fleet across sales and marketing, with anticipated value exceeding $7M by 2026.

---

Key differences explained

Developer toolkit vs. enterprise solution: different problems entirely

This is the fundamental distinction, and it matters more than any feature comparison.

Microsoft Agent Framework is a developer toolkit. It provides building blocks: agent definitions, multi-agent orchestration patterns (group chat, debate, reflection), enterprise connectors via Semantic Kernel, and managed hosting through Microsoft Foundry's Agent Service. Your engineering team assembles these building blocks into working systems. The framework handles coordination logic. Your team handles everything else: deployment infrastructure, monitoring, scaling, security layers beyond Azure defaults, compliance certification, error handling at the business level, change management, user adoption, and ongoing maintenance.

Nexus is an enterprise solution: platform plus service. Business teams build agents through the platform interface, and the platform handles deployment, scaling, monitoring, governance, integrations, and maintenance. Forward Deployed Engineers handle everything the platform does not: identifying the right use cases, designing agents for your specific workflows, managing integration complexity, running change management, and continuously optimizing. The agent is production-ready from day one. The service ensures it delivers business outcomes.

This is not a criticism of Microsoft Agent Framework. It is backed by one of the most important companies in enterprise technology, and the engineering community has validated its approach. But a developer toolkit and an enterprise solution solve different problems. A toolkit gives you maximum flexibility to build exactly what you want. A solution gives you maximum speed to deploy what your business needs, with people embedded to make sure it works.

The Microsoft agent landscape: three paths, one decision

One challenge specific to the Microsoft ecosystem is that Microsoft offers multiple paths to build agents, and each serves a different audience:

Copilot Studio is a low-code platform for business users building conversational agents integrated with M365. It excels at rapid prototyping and simpler agent workflows within the Microsoft 365 environment.

Microsoft Foundry Agent Service is the managed runtime for deploying agents built with code, supporting Microsoft Agent Framework, LangGraph, CrewAI, and other frameworks. It handles hosting, identity, observability, and governance at the infrastructure level.

Microsoft Agent Framework is the open-source SDK itself: the orchestration logic, agent definitions, and multi-agent patterns that developers use to write agent code.

For engineering leaders, this creates a decision tree before you even start building. Which path fits your use case? How do these tools work together? What happens when a workflow is too complex for Copilot Studio but does not need the full flexibility of Agent Framework? Microsoft's own documentation acknowledges this is a common question. The answer is often "use both," which means coordinating two platforms, two skill sets, and two development workflows within your team.

Nexus is a single platform. One tool for building, deploying, and managing agents, regardless of complexity. No decision tree. No platform coordination.

Microsoft-native vs. system-agnostic: your architecture decides

Microsoft Agent Framework works best inside the Microsoft ecosystem. Azure hosting, M365 integration, Dynamics connectors, SharePoint access, Entra ID authentication: these are native. That is a genuine strength if your infrastructure lives there.

But most enterprise workflows do not stay inside one vendor's ecosystem. A customer onboarding workflow might touch Salesforce, a custom API, WhatsApp, and your ERP. A sales intelligence agent might pull from dozens of data sources across multiple platforms. A compliance monitoring agent might need to audit interactions across Slack, email, phone, and a ticketing system. The moment a workflow crosses the Microsoft boundary, the framework's home-field advantage fades and custom integration work begins.

Nexus is system-agnostic. The same agent connects to 4,000+ enterprise systems, Microsoft and non-Microsoft, and deploys across any channel: Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, email, phone, web widgets, and internal portals. One agent, multiple vendors, no ecosystem constraints. For enterprises with heterogeneous tech stacks (which is most enterprises), this independence matters.

Who builds: the bottleneck that changes everything

With Microsoft Agent Framework, the builder is an engineer. Every agent requires code. Every workflow change requires development. Every new integration requires engineering work. The people who understand the business problem (sales, operations, support) describe what they need. The people who can build it (engineers) add it to the backlog.

With Nexus, the builder is the business team. The person who understands the workflow is the same person who builds the agent. Joaquin Paz at Lambda is Head of Sales Intelligence, not an engineer. He built an agent monitoring 12,000+ accounts because he understood what intelligence the sales team needed. No engineering dependency. No backlog. No translation layer between "what we need" and "what gets built."

This changes iteration speed fundamentally. When the business team can modify an agent's behavior directly (add a data source, change an escalation rule, adjust priorities), the feedback loop drops from weeks to hours.

Forward Deployed Engineers: the service layer that makes the difference

Most enterprise AI vendors sell software and disappear. Microsoft provides a framework with documentation, community support, and paid support tiers. Your team owns the outcome entirely.

Nexus embeds Forward Deployed Engineers with your organization. These are real engineers who work alongside your team to:

• Identify the highest-impact use cases first (not guessing based on templates)
• Design agents that fit your specific reality (not generic off-the-shelf configurations)
• Handle integration complexity (so your team does not have to learn a new platform)
• Run pilots without requiring your internal engineering resources
• Manage organizational change (because deploying AI at scale changes how work gets done)
• Optimize continuously based on real-world performance data

This is why Nexus has a 100% POC-to-contract conversion rate. Every pilot converts to an annual contract because Nexus does not move on until it delivers measurable value. That is not a product feature. That is a partnership model.

---

Frequently asked questions

Can our engineering team use Microsoft Agent Framework alongside Nexus?

Yes. Some enterprises use developer frameworks for product-facing AI capabilities (where deep customization and ecosystem integration matter) and Nexus for internal business workflows (where speed, business ownership, and cross-system integration matter). The two solve different problems for different teams and do not conflict.

We are a Microsoft shop. Does Nexus work with our stack?

Nexus deploys natively across Microsoft Teams, integrates with Dynamics, SharePoint, and Azure services, and works alongside your existing Microsoft infrastructure. Being system-agnostic does not mean avoiding Microsoft. It means working with Microsoft and everything else. Your agents can span your entire tech stack, not just the Microsoft portion of it.

We already have engineers who know AutoGen and Semantic Kernel. Why would we choose Nexus?

You do not have to choose one or the other. The question is where your engineers' time is best spent. Lambda has world-class AI engineers. They chose Nexus for their agent infrastructure because the opportunity cost of building and maintaining agent systems internally was too high. Their engineers build AI cloud infrastructure; that is Lambda's core product. Your engineers likely have a similar core product that deserves their attention. The question is not capability; it is allocation.

How does deployment speed actually compare?

With Microsoft Agent Framework, expect weeks to months depending on complexity. Building the agents is one piece, but architecture design, Azure infrastructure setup, custom governance layers, testing, change management, and integration work across systems add significant time. With Nexus, most enterprise POCs go live within 2 to 6 weeks, with a Forward Deployed Engineer handling integration and configuration alongside your team. Lambda went from zero to production in days.

Is Microsoft Agent Framework free?

The framework itself is open-source. But the total cost includes Azure compute, engineering salaries for the team building and maintaining agents in production, custom integration work for non-Microsoft systems, and ongoing maintenance as the framework evolves (including managing breaking changes between versions). For Lambda, the math was clear: the engineering time alone made building internally more expensive than the platform. Nexus pricing is per-agent, tied to value delivered, and every engagement starts with a 3-month POC tied to measurable outcomes so you see the ROI before committing.

What about Microsoft's enterprise trust and security?

Microsoft's enterprise credibility is real. Azure's security infrastructure is world-class, and Entra ID provides a strong identity foundation. But Microsoft Agent Framework provides the compute, orchestration, and hosting layer. Agent-level governance (audit trails for every decision, traceability across every interaction, role-based access for business teams, compliance certifications specific to agent operations) is still your engineering team's responsibility to design and build. Nexus ships with that governance built in: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR compliance from day one.

Microsoft says Microsoft Foundry can host agents from any framework. Does that change the comparison?

Microsoft Foundry Agent Service can indeed host agents built with Microsoft Agent Framework, LangGraph, CrewAI, and other frameworks. That is a real capability. But hosting is one layer of the problem. Agent creation, business-team ownership, cross-system integration beyond Azure, enterprise governance at the agent level, change management, and ongoing optimization are separate challenges. Foundry solves hosting and infrastructure. Nexus solves the full lifecycle from use case identification through production value delivery, with engineers embedded to make sure it works.

---

Worth exploring?

If your team has been evaluating Microsoft Agent Framework and wrestling with the engineering trade-off (how much engineering capacity to allocate, how long until production, whether to constrain workflows to the Microsoft ecosystem, how to handle the organizational change that comes with deploying AI), it might be worth seeing how Lambda approached a similar decision.

Lambda is a multibillion-dollar AI company with world-class engineers. They concluded the opportunity cost of building internally was too high. Their Head of Sales Intelligence, with no engineering background, deployed in days what would have taken months to build. Anticipated value: $7M+ by 2026.

Every engagement starts with a 3-month proof of concept tied to specific outcomes. A Forward Deployed Engineer works alongside your team from day one. You can exit anytime.

---

Related comparisons

• Nexus vs Microsoft Copilot -- Microsoft's AI assistant vs. autonomous agents that complete work
• Nexus vs CrewAI -- Another developer framework comparison: powerful for engineers, but requires engineering
• Nexus vs LangGraph -- Developer framework vs. business-ready platform: build vs. buy
• AI Agents vs Developer Frameworks -- The full build vs. buy comparison: LangGraph, CrewAI, and custom builds
• Back to all comparisons -->